Bat Teeth and Jaws Evolution: How Food From 25 Million Years Ago Shaped the Face of the Bats Today

(Photo : Hulton Archive / Getty Images)
Bat teeth and jaws evolution was influenced by the type of food that was around 25 million years ago.

About 25 million years ago, food that was accessible and within colonies' grasp had a significant impact on the evolution of bat teeth and jaws.

Similar to Darwin's finches, which exhibit diverse beak shapes based on their diets, bats have an intriguing evolutionary adaptation related to food. Over 200 noctilionoid bat species, primarily in the American tropics, display an array of jaw adaptations for exploiting distinct food sources. Their adjustments encompass tooth count, size, shape, and placement.

Short-snouted bats lack specific teeth due to space constraints, while longer-jawed bats accommodate more teeth, resembling early placental mammal ancestors. This research on noctilionoid bats sheds light on mammalian facial evolution, especially in jaws and teeth, offering insights into the human's dental development. Unraveling mysteries about tooth formation is an additional benefit.

Food Influences From 25 Million Years Ago

Noctilionoid bats, as explained by co-authors Sharlene Santana and lead author Alexa Sadier, possess all four types of teeth found in humans: incisors, canines, premolars, and molars. These bats rapidly diversified their diets in just 25 million years, a remarkably short timeframe for such adaptations. Some species have short, powerful jaws, akin to bulldogs, enabling them to consume tough fruit exteriors.

Others boast elongated snouts for sipping nectar from flowers. Sadier's research, initiated during her postdoctoral work at UCLA, aimed to uncover the mechanisms behind this swift dietary evolution.

The trigger for this dietary adaptation frenzy in noctilionoid bats remains a mystery. Presently, these bats consume insects, fruits, nectar, fish, and even blood, as vampire bats belong to this group. Understanding these adaptations offers valuable insights into mammalian evolution and dental development.

Teeth and Jaws of 100 Bats

Using CT scans and various techniques, the team examined the jaws, premolars, and molars of over 100 noctilionoid species, combining museum specimens with captured wild bats. By comparing tooth and cranial sizes across different dietary preferences and employing mathematical modeling, they unveiled "developmental rules'' governing tooth assortment. Bats with long or intermediate jaws typically featured the standard three premolars and three molars on each side.

In contrast, short-jawed fruit-eaters often lacked the middle premolar or back molar, sometimes both. This research sheds light on how these adaptations evolved and gives a better understanding of the intricacies of dental development in diverse bat species.

Also Read: Endangered Northern Long-Eared Bat Establishes Population in 'Caveless' Alabama, Escaping White-Nose Syndrome

Understanding Jaw Structure and Potential

In cases where bats have more space, they can accommodate more teeth, while those with shorter jaws, though possessing powerful bites, lack room for additional teeth. Short-faced bats tend to have wider front molars due to their constrained jaw size. The initial teeth often grow larger, as there's insufficient room for subsequent ones.

This project allows testing assumptions about tooth growth, shape, and size regulation in mammals, shedding light on the development of these vital structures that remain poorly understood.

Previous studies on tooth development primarily used mice, which possess modified incisors and molars. It remains uncertain if the same genetic and developmental patterns apply to mammals like bats and humans, with more "ancestral" tooth structures.

Researchers, led by Sadier and Santana, aim to address these questions through their ongoing bat study, seeking to uncover genetic and developmental mechanisms controlling tooth development. They plan to expand their research to include incisors and canines, ultimately unraveling more evolutionary secrets in this diverse group of bats. Santana notes strong selective pressures in these species, emphasizing the functional matching of shapes, hinting at concealed evolutionary insights.