Scientists to Use Geoengineering to Lower Global Temperatures and Combat Malaria Spread

According to experts, geoengineering to avert the worst effects of climate change might expose up to a billion additional people to malaria.

The study, published in Nature Communications, is the first to look at how climate engineering may alter the burden of infectious illnesses.

Removing Carbon Dioxide

Record Heat Wave Exacerbates Devastating Drought In Central U.S.

(Photo : Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to reduce heat trapping, and solar radiation management (SRM) - reflecting more sunlight away from the globe to minimize heat absorption in the first place. The latter might be accomplished in various ways, such as by spraying particles into the sky to reflect sunlight away from the ground.

This study focused on the latter, especially putting aerosols into the stratosphere that deflect incoming sunlight, thereby "halting" global warming for the time being. Though SRM is frequently mentioned as a means of addressing climate injustice, its possible health consequences have received little attention.

Also Read:

At Least 30% of Americans Remained Unafraid of the Climate Crisis

Rapid Decline of Insect Population Causes Scientists to Worry About Earth's Future

Simulations

Volcanic glass, potential mosquito population control

(Photo : Wikimedia Commons)

Scientists created simulations of malaria transmission in two future scenarios: with and without geoengineering and with medium or high degrees of global warming. The models determine which temperatures are most favorable to mosquito transmission by the Anopheles genus and the number of individuals living in places where transmission is possible.

They discovered that high temperatures killed the malaria parasite in specific regions; therefore, immediately cooling the area might reverse such losses, increasing the illness. Simulations indicated that a billion more people would be at risk of malaria in the geoengineered world under the high-temperature scenario.

"The study has important implications for decision-making," said Colin Carlson, an associate research professor at Georgetown University Medical Center and the study's primary author. "While geoengineering may save lives, the idea that it will do so equally for all countries may put certain governments at a disadvantage when making decisions." We should be able to tally up the risks and benefits of geoengineering if it's about defending communities on the frontlines of climate change, especially in terms of neglected health costs like mosquito-borne illness."

Also Read: Iceland May Lose its Ice in the Next 100 Years Due to Climate Change

Antarctica's Doomsday Glacier at Risk of Collapsing, Could Permanently Change Global Coastline

Potential results of Geoengineering

According to previous results, geoengineering might lower malaria in certain areas while raising it in others. In all scenarios, the scientists discovered that geoengineering might significantly lower malaria risk in the Indian subcontinent, even with current conditions. However, in Southeast Asia, the protective impact would be outweighed by increased risk.

"In a too hot world for people, the malaria parasite likewise gets too hot," Carlson explains. "Cooling the globe may be a last-ditch effort to preserve lives, but it would also reverse the downward trend."