Eight shipping container-sized boxes were assembled in Hellisheii, Iceland, in January 2021, next to the world's third-largest geothermal power station. Later this year, the twelve massive fans installed on the exterior of each box will begin spinning.
The Orca facility is designed to remove about 4,000 tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere per year. Orca is the largest example of direct air capture to date, developed by the Swiss engineering company Climeworks to suck carbon dioxide out of thin air.
Direct Air Capture
Related Article: It Takes $1 Trillion Per Year to Remove Unwanted CO2 in Earth
For decades, scientists have been capturing carbon dioxide, mainly from highly concentrated sources such as power plants. The goal of direct air capture technology is to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere somewhere on the planet.
Overall, it is a method of collecting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (rather than from point sources like a cement factory or a biomass power plant) and producing a concentrated stream of carbon dioxide for sequestration, consumption, or output carbon-neutral fuel and windgas. When surface air comes into contact with chemical media, such as an aqueous alkaline solution or functionalized sorbents, carbon dioxide is removed.
Direct air capture can be thought of as "space-efficient artificial plants," according to Beuttler. After all, trees are the original carbon-sequestering engines. But, according to Klaus Lackner, director of the University of Arizona's Center for Negative Carbon Emissions, even though we covered Earth's landmasses in natural forests, we wouldn't be able to suck up enough carbon to reduce climate change in the future. He's also the inventor of his own carbon-capture system.
Planting, for example, is a natural solution that may help control carbon dioxide. However, the plants will not be able to keep up with human activities in the long run.
Cost
One of the largest hurdles to implementing DAC is the cost required to separate carbon dioxide from the air. A study from 2011 estimated that a plant designed to capture 1 megatonne of carbon a year would cost $2.2 billion. Other studies from the same period put the cost of DAC at $200-1000 per tonne of carbon dioxide ​and $600 per ton.
Environmental Impact
DAC proponents contend that it is a necessary part of climate change mitigation. Researchers believe that DAC could contribute to the Paris Climate Agreement's goals (namely, keeping global average temperature rise far below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels).
On the other hand, others argue that relying on this technology is costly and may delay carbon reductions in the hope of resolving the issue eventually and that reducing emissions is a safer option.
Also Read: Nature Wonders: One More Great Thing Green Spaces Can Do
For more news update about Environmental Action, don't forget to follow Nature World News!