The findings, headed by the University of Bristol, call into question the long-held view that people are indifferent to the energy content of the foods they eat and hence eat the same quantity of food whether it is high in energy or low in energy.
The study, which was published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, is particularly noteworthy since it contradicts a widely held belief among experts that individuals are prone to overeating high-energy meals.
This concept is based on prior research that altered the energy composition of foods or meals to produce low- and high-energy variants.
People were not told whether they were eating a low- or high-energy version in those tests, and the results revealed that they tended to eat meals of the same weight, resulting in obesity.
Eating in moderation
Rather than changing the calories in single items purposefully, this study examined data from a trial using common, everyday meals with varying energy densities, such as a chicken salad sandwich with fig roll biscuits or oatmeal with blueberries and almonds.
The study featured 20 healthy people who spent four weeks in a hospital ward, where they were fed a variety of meals.
The calories, grams, and energy density (calories per gram) for each meal were determined by a worldwide team of researchers, which included prominent specialists in food and metabolism from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States.
As in prior studies with artificially altered meals, the data showed that meal calorie consumption rose with energy density in energy-poor meals.
This study gives fresh information on human eating habits, particularly a seemingly slight sensitivity to calories in high-calorie meals.
Professor of Experimental Psychology Jeff Brunstrom, a co-author, said, "This research adds weight to the hypothesis that people aren't passive overeaters after all, but rather have the discriminating capacity to limit how much of an energy-rich meal they take."
This research is particularly intriguing because it indicates a previously unknown level of sophistication in how people interact with current energy-dense meals, which they have dubbed "nutritional intelligence."
This indicated that humans do not appear to passively overconsume these foods, implying that the reason they are linked to obesity is more complex than previously assumed.
Also Read: Could Ketogenic Diet Help Fight Pancreatic Cancer? New Study Says it is Possible
Benefits of eating in moderation
Scaling back portion sizes, pushing away your plate when you're full, restricting sweets, adding more nutritional diversity to your meals, measuring calorie intake, or any combination of these alternatives are all examples of eating in moderation, as per Planet Fitness.
While your friends, relatives, and coworkers may be reaping the benefits of elimination diets, this kind of eating isn't for everyone.
When individuals around you can't (or don't want to) consume certain foods, it's easy to doubt the effectiveness of eating in moderation.
It's crucial to remember in these circumstances that everyone is on their own path, and just because cutting out dairy helps your neighbor doesn't imply it will benefit you.
According to US officials, a modest and varied diet can aid weight reduction, weight control, and overall health, according to U.S. News & World Report.
This is proof that you don't have to give up pizza for the rest of your life to see the effects; all you have to do is be conscious of how often and how many pieces you consume.
You can regulate and fight off cravings by continuing to consume the things you enjoy and without limiting yourself.
According to Health magazine, no meal that you appreciate should have a negative connotation; rather, it should be enjoyed in moderation when you exercise consistently.
When you consume in moderation, you may better understand your body's nutritional requirements.
Related article: Alternative Plant-Based Diet Lowers Chances of Developing Diabetes